Cloud Infrastructure for AI Business
How managers choose a platform, govern complexity and evaluate infrastructure economics
How managers choose a platform, govern complexity and evaluate infrastructure economics
How managers choose a platform, govern complexity and evaluate infrastructure economics
Technical Director & Fellow, T-Technologies
Architecture and engineering R&D.
AI adoption in SDLC.
Focus: cloud platform choice.
Options, criteria and regular governance
No basic recap — Cloud, IaaS/PaaS/SaaS — in notes.
We look like managers — Options, acceleration, risk.
We calculate economics — We keep the resource, hardware, payback and FinOps examples.
Before choosing technology, understand which speed, control and accountability the business is buying
Platform: public, managed, private, hybrid.
Where speed matters; where control matters.
Owners: platform, product, security, finance.
Loop: cost, reliability, reversibility.
The rational answer is usually a mix
Public / managed — Speed and services; provider-rule dependency.
Private platform — Scale, compliance, predictable load.
Hybrid strategy — Core controlled; spikes stay in cloud.
What accelerates business
Launch time and change frequency.
Managed services: DB, queues, AI, observability.
Reduced infrastructure load on product teams.
What contains risk
Data, compliance, access, audit.
Predictable cost under growing load.
Critical-loop exit strategy.
Move not servers, but the model of speed, risk, accountability and change governance
Migrate when
Faster product and environment launch.
The existing platform blocks delivery speed.
Clear domain, owner, success criteria.
Wait when
Stable, cheap, non-blocking service.
Team cannot own the new ops-loop.
Technical fashion without business impact.
At each step recalculate not only progress, but also accountability, cost and reliability
Migration without priority and owners.
Move itself beats speed/reliability/economics.
Unclear: on-call, changes, risk, bill.
Old delivery process in new cloud.
Repeatable safe infrastructure change
Infrastructure as code (IaC) matters when change trace, guardrails and environment repeatability matter
Orchestration pays off only with a platform team, mature practices and real service variability
Unnamed accountability appears in incidents
Platform — Standards, templates, baseline reliability, observability, security and the change path.
Product — Architecture decisions, load, user value and product unit cost.
Governance — Security, access, audit, forecast, allocation and TCO.
Compare order of magnitude: cloud resources, buying a server and the payback point
720 hours per month, public Yandex Cloud rates for vCPU, RAM and network storage
Rough monthly cost of compute, RAM and two storage scenarios
Catalog example
Dell PowerEdge R750: 24 physical cores.
64 GB RAM in base configuration.
Catalog price: from 566,050 ₽.
What is not included
noHDD: price disks separately.
No DC, power, network, licenses, ops.
Educational order-of-magnitude estimate.
At large predictable load, managers must calculate when owning the platform is better than buying it as a service
Recurring accountability, forecast and team behavior
You need to see which decisions create spend: compute, storage, network and managed services
Finance, product and engineering must discuss cost in one regular loop
Calculate cost per useful product unit.
Unit economics shows margin decay earlier.
Reliability has price and risk.
Mature FinOps changes team behavior.
Key question: when is owning the baseline platform cheaper and more reliable than buying it as public cloud?
Core sources
FinOps Foundation - FinOps Framework: finops.org/framework/
CNCF Kubernetes docs: kubernetes.io/docs/ · cncf.io
Cloud architecture frameworks.
Yandex Cloud pricing and Servermall R750.