
What should the agent see next?
Goals, evidence selection and reacquisition through a CI example
Slide contents
1. What should the agent see next?
Goals, evidence selection and reacquisition through a CI example
2. Context serves the next step
Goal, evidence retention, reacquisition and CI verification
3. Context already belonged to the harness
Deepening evidence selection after tools, memory and coordination
4. One project needs different views
Atlas: diagnose code or confirm an external run
5. GACC tests retention of relevant evidence
Preprint dated October 15, 2026
6. The goal precedes specific questions
One SymPy trace: repair validation or algorithm behavior
7. One view serves several hidden questions
Compressor, reader and judge receive different inputs
8. One omission breaks complete goal coverage
Micro counts answers; Macro requires every answer for a goal
9. Answering everything is much harder
Full benchmark · retention budget: 10% of source context
10. A mismatched goal loses useful evidence
GPT-6.1-Sol · testmini · 10% retention budget
11. Budget limits size, not quality
The retained view is capped at 10% of source length
12. This tests compression, not whole agents
Static answerability does not replace task execution
13. Dropped state may need reacquisition
Shuyu Liu · arXiv:2608.16370v1 · August 17, 2026
14. Completion can hide extra retrieval
GPT-5.5 · High-IR · full history versus sliding 5×
15. Restoring state reduces repeated retrieval
DeepSeek · High-IR · separate intervention batch
16. Cost depends on model and environment
Extra retrieval did not appear in every probe
17. References let agents fetch details later
Engineering guidance: initial anchors plus retrieval when needed
18. A context view starts with evidence
For c3 diagnosis, select evidence that can be checked
19. Compaction retains decisions and uncertainty
Shorten history while preserving access to its evidence
20. Findings travel with their evidence
The coordinator receives a claim, evidence and limits
21. Log text does not grant authority
Preserve provenance and distinguish data from instructions
22. Evaluate outcomes and reacquisition cost
Back to episode 42: outcome, trajectory and comparison conditions
23. Good context can be tested through action
Sufficient evidence for the next goal, with explicit gaps