Skip to content
Research Insights Made Simple
Research reviewResearch Insights Made Simple

Experts across a cluster

MoE models across a cluster: attention/expert disaggregation, micro-batch pipelines and M-to-N exchange

/ Research Insights Made Simple · Cluster inference 2/7 · Experts across a cluster

Slide contents

  1. 1. Experts across a cluster

    MoE models across a cluster: attention/expert disaggregation, micro-batch pipelines and M-to-N exchange

  2. 2. MoE across a cluster moves the bottleneck

    MegaScale-Infer (ByteDance Seed) and the DeepSeek-V3/R1 system overview

  3. 3. Experts add a new partitioning axis

    From tensor and pipeline partitioning to expert parallelism

  4. 4. The coding assistant’s MoE needs several nodes

    16 nodes × 8 H100 80 GB · NVLink inside a node · InfiniBand 400 Gb/s

  5. 5. Sparsity splits the batch across experts

    The paper’s example: Mixtral 8x22B on A100, bf16

  6. 6. Expert parallelism needs two all-to-all exchanges

    Tokens travel to their chosen experts and back

  7. 7. Attention and experts move to separate nodes

    Disaggregated expert parallelism: M attention replicas, N expert nodes

  8. 8. Micro-batches fill idle time, ping-pong style

    m micro-batches alternate between attention and experts

  9. 9. Deployment plans are searched under an SLO

    Attention and expert TP, replica count, micro-batches, batch size

  10. 10. Attention wants memory; experts want compute

    Per-price specifications · prices normalized to L20

  11. 11. M-to-N traffic needs its own library

    No GPU-to-CPU copies, group setup or GPU synchronization

  12. 12. At 256 KB, p99 latency drops 92.9%

    Microbenchmark: 8 senders, 8 receivers, one 200 Gb/s NIC per GPU

  13. 13. Decode gains reach 1.90× over TensorRT-LLM

    8 nodes × 8 Ampere 80 GB GPUs · TBT ≤ 150 ms · bf16

  14. 14. Per-token latency does not shrink

    Every layer adds a cross-node exchange

  15. 15. H20/L40S pairs beat homogeneous clusters on cost

    Attention on H20, experts on L40S · per unit price and power

  16. 16. Disaggregation, not just networking, drives the gain

    Ampere ablations: disaggregation, M2N, micro-batches, attention replicas

  17. 17. In production, expert load is uneven

    Nearly 10,000 GPUs · 1.5–2.0× lower cost, as reported by the authors

  18. 18. DeepSeek stretches expert parallelism over 18 nodes

    8 of 256 experts per layer · prefill EP32 · decode EP144

  19. 19. DeepSeek’s one-day load peaked at 278 nodes

    Feb 27, 2025 12:00 → Feb 28, 2025 12:00, UTC+8 · 8×H800 nodes

  20. 20. Gains depend on decode and testbed conditions

    What was measured and what does not follow

  21. 21. For Orbit, first count tokens per expert

    Assumptions: DeepSeek-V3 shape, 8 of 256 experts; H100 ≈ Table 3’s H800

  22. 22. Disaggregation pays off only when balanced

    Per-expert batch, Ta ≈ Te, communication shorter than compute

  23. 23. Experts force cluster planning, not node planning

    What Orbit adopts and what it tests first