Skip to content

AI Dev Live · 11 November 2026

AI made development faster

AI made development faster?How can we tell if that is true?
/ AI Dev Live · 11 November 2026

Slide contents

  1. 1. AI made development faster

    How can we tell if that is true?

  2. 2. What did the measurement find?

  3. 3. Perceived speedup needs a separate check

  4. 4. METR’s result comes from familiar repositories

  5. 5. CLI agents: more merged PRs

    Counts PRs, not time or quality

  6. 6. Commits per engineer rose at Anthropic

  7. 7. Each result applies to its own conditions

  8. 8. Alexander Polomodov

    Alexander Polomodov, Technology leader with experience as a CTO and Technical Fellow at a large fintech, polomodov.tech

    Research Insights Made Simple

    Connecting research with engineering practice.

    Focus — Productivity · architecture · AI4SDLC

  9. 9. Two levels of measurement

  10. 10. 1A. Company-wide measurement

    Discovery + delivery · the path to a customer outcome

  11. 11. From hypothesis to customer value

  12. 12. How to measure the end-to-end outcome

  13. 13. Product engineers own work end to end

  14. 14. A tiny team owns the whole cycle

  15. 15. 1B. Company-wide delivery

    Measuring AI code assistants and agents · DX and RIMS #11

  16. 16. How DX measures AI in delivery

  17. 17. Measure adoption in the context of work

  18. 18. An adoption rate needs a denominator

  19. 19. Assistance mode changes the work

  20. 20. A tool event is not an outcome

  21. 21. Google · Measuring Developer Goals

  22. 22. Session durations are not human effort

  23. 23. Local speed changes downstream queues

  24. 24. Logs and survey form one picture

  25. 25. Three methods reveal different aspects

  26. 26. New tools change measurement itself

  27. 27. The comparison sets the strength of inference

  28. 28. 02. The economics of specific use cases

    AI review · migrations · interface prototypes

  29. 29. Each use case has its own unit of value

  30. 30. AI review is already enabled

  31. 31. A useful comment has a cost

  32. 32. Review settings change the cost

  33. 33. Tune AI review by PR risk

  34. 34. Repetition drives migration economics

  35. 35. A migration ends at acceptance

  36. 36. Setup pays off at the fifth batch

  37. 37. The remaining migration shapes the decision

  38. 38. PMs can test an interface earlier

  39. 39. Measure the cost of a product decision

  40. 40. One test scenario costs $160 less

  41. 41. The prototype carries a decision into delivery

  42. 42. Gains show up in time, money and risk

  43. 43. What to change after the calculation

  44. 44. Continue the conversation in the podcasts

  45. 45. The next tasks may add less value

  46. 46. Measure the change in work

    Discovery + delivery · use-case economics

    Book Cube

    Which decision can you make after measuring?

    Alexander Polomodov, Technology leader, polomodov.tech

    t.me/book_cube